Home

Advertisement

Amazing awesome Scandinavian short (not porn)

  • Nov. 26th, 2009 at 12:56 PM
serious
From Denmark, via W C Dixon , totally brilliant short (apart from the very last bit, IMHO):




... which, like The Gimp adresses the perennial question of early 21st century males "WHY AM I NOT A FRICKIN' SUPERHERO?"

Lulu Thankyou Note

  • Nov. 24th, 2009 at 5:57 PM
serious
Grrr, found that the thankyou note I wrote for LULU didn't save at the weekend, just re-constituted it, and think it's not bad, so I thought I'd pop it up here:

Firstly, THANK YOU for buying my stuff (which makes it, in a very real sense, your stuff now).

All my stuff is released under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike license.

Which means that, as long as you're not charging for it, you link back to me, and you release your stuff under the same terms, you can do what you want with it. Copy and give it to your friends. Copy it and give it to strangers. Turn it into a 7 hour opera cycle. Recite excerpts at dinner parties. Make a fan film and upload it to youtube. Make an audiobook. Make an album of ambient dub inspired by it. Use my embarassingly long character monologues as audition pieces.

Get Excited.

Make Things.

And if you want to make money out of it... well, drop me a line and get permission first. I'm a reasonable man, despite the stuff that I write.

One more thing... if you like my stuff, tell people. Lend the books to folks you think will like them. Mail them the PDF's (I promise, I don't mind, really). Blog, tweet, post and just plain talk.

And if you don't like them... well, the most harm you can do is to not tell anyone. Because I guarantee that if you tell ten people that the book is awful, at least one of them will buy it.

And did I mention... THANK YOU!

ENJOY!

Peter Darby
http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=2001567
serious
So, I'm talking to my son about creating a character for a Discworld RPG, daughter comes in, and just sits and starts drawing...

"What you drawing?"

"Oh, this is my character..."

"Is she a princess?"

"Well, she was, until she was given a ring by her granny, that her mum and dad don't like her to talk to, and it glowed, which meant she was a witch like granny was secretly, so her parents found out and threw her our, even though she was a princess and only ten. And she's travelling the world to find someone to teach her witchcraft. This is her cat. She accidentally cast a spell on it and now it talks, and it's REALLY ANNOYING."

Wow. Character with interesting history, conflict and motivation and even a great comedy sidekick. In as long as it took me to type that.

That character CANNOT have anything dull happen to it.

From Twitter 09-22-2009

  • Sep. 23rd, 2009 at 3:00 AM
serious

  • 03:13:08: From Twitter 09-21-2009: 05:49:13: From Twitter 09-20-2009: 05:42:02: From Twitter 09-19-2009: 05:54:51: From Tw.. http://bit.ly/4SwWb
  • 08:37:49: @lucypaw Don't get eaten by a grue!
  • 08:38:57: @Bang2write I was just hoping someone would start my day with a truly gruesome mental image. Thanks. Cock salmon. FFS.
  • 08:40:45: @EdOtherwise What, by the tories?
  • 08:47:34: Dammit, I DID manage to destroy the wrong livejournal posts last night...
  • 08:51:37: @JoelRonson *applause!*
  • 08:53:46: @GaryDelaney And however bad you are, you're better than the last guy.
  • 09:02:30: @SaliWho (thumbs up)
  • 09:18:44: @jonnynexus Apparently, only if you tell the crim's mum.
  • 09:18:55: @jonnynexus sorry, victim's mum.
  • 10:01:27: @simonpegg Bigass, but decaff, since the restraining order. And no milk, gives me the squits.
  • 10:27:20: @Brownthorn As soon as they demonstrate that a child benefits from "full time" helicopter education, then they've got a basis to ask.
  • 10:28:17: @SaliWho It's a one show style trucker's gear change. #Radio4
  • 10:30:23: Question: is there any evidence that "full time education" is better for children than free range, do what you like when you?
  • 10:31:46: Question: is there any evidence that "full time education" is better for children than free range, do what you like when you like?
  • 10:33:30: @Glinner Are they the chuckle brothers?
  • 10:40:31: @SaliWho Is today's story Heart of Darkness read by Joe Pasquale? #Radio4
  • 10:45:51: @Brownthorn It's hot to be a girly swot. FFS. Because if there's one thing bullies listen to, it's governmental publicity campaigns.
  • 10:57:30: @EmmaK67 You and your fancy city ways.
  • 11:02:36: @jupitusphillip Only one way to sort this out....
  • 11:09:07: @jamesmoran wear an impressive hat. Important people always wear impressive hats.
  • 11:14:03: I may not be the next Sugarbabe, but I'm WELL IN to be the next Chas. Or possibly Dave.
  • 11:16:22: @bridd Which one's the lardy one at the joanna, which is the streak of p with a guitar?
  • 11:16:41: @alexispetridis oh, Welsh psychopath is he?
  • 11:18:44: @jupitusphillip That's enough of your sauce, young man #NotEvenFunnyWhenMyDadDidIt
  • 11:19:50: @IanAppleby Frankly, in any bloody way. Educational, emotional, social, psychological....
  • 11:24:46: @tweetminster Really? I Thought "strength and safety" were fascist values...
  • 11:55:20: In which I am a moron: Okay, this blog is now officially for Script Bashing; personal and HE posts will go .. http://bit.ly/gUWEK
  • 12:27:16: @SpeedyJR If our best argument for schools is that they keep fagins gang off the streets...
  • 13:18:53: @thegodofallbens If I call it a report, it makes me feel all pro-feshnyall loik. And less likely to say "BESTEST SCRIPT EVAH!" or "FAIL!"
  • 13:23:05: Arse. Didn't by my ticket for the Sugarbabes membership draw this week (with Chas and /or Dave bonus ball) h/t @michaellegge
  • 13:31:42: @AnneBillson Silliest criticism I've heard of BitSP: "But he wouldn't have been allowed that close to the wire!" Oh, must be shit then...
  • 13:32:11: @CUnderkoffler Pffft!
  • 13:39:20: @Firequacker I like my women like i like my coffee. Bitter and slightly off the boil. Wait. No.
  • 13:40:08: @MerseyMal He should ask whether they'd take in a one eyed, overweight Griffin that no-one wants...
  • 13:49:35: Listening to prez prado. Mamboing on the inside.
  • 13:51:06: @JoelRonson Oh mate, what?
  • 13:53:19: @JoelRonson Phew!
  • 13:54:00: @JoelRonson (showing how old I am, that I feel relieved when I have a dull lunch...)
  • 13:56:50: @JoelRonson Fair enough.
  • 13:58:21: Our tune: http://bit.ly/HJc3x
  • 14:00:04: @Bang2write only life coaching book I ever liked: http://bit.ly/10jhpV and then that fell apart when I heard the guy talk. Brooklyn nasal.
  • 14:04:15: @Bang2write Note to self: do not use the title of that book in script report EVER.
  • 14:43:55: Someone once described Fairport Convention as more of a movement than a band. Why not Sugababes?
  • 14:47:00: @dave_turner I didn't say it was a good movement. It is, lets face it a (steels himself)... brand.
  • 15:02:43: @AnneBillson Yeah. The best representation of the war years was 'Allo 'Allo.
  • 15:10:11: @AnneBillson I shall once again mention in passing how I dragged Vicki Michelle around a rehearsal room while she clung to my leg...
  • 15:24:17: @AnneBillson *boggle*
  • 15:37:22: @Bang2write not any more.
  • 15:38:29: @ruthiemossy I was constantly mistaken for a girl when very young. Now look at me. Jesus.
  • 15:42:01: @AnneBillson At the Wirral Show or on the front?
  • 15:43:47: @moviegrrl do tell, do tell...
  • 15:45:52: @moviegrrl I would not be at all surprised if he was....
  • 15:47:41: @moviegrrl Thinks: wonder if you know my other half's aunt... (a whole 4 years older than me)
  • 15:48:49: @AnneBillson Probably part of the front, and thus knocked down or "went on fire" for the insurance years ago. So you WIN!
  • 15:49:14: @AnneBillson Well, some of them haven't changed much...
  • 16:06:42: @Bang2write Being a druid, i don't hail Mary, but I can go to Stonehenge and hail stones #PossessedByGroucho
  • 16:11:07: @dave_turner You or the characters?
  • 21:07:17: @jodiekearns Can't "style" for size 12+? Then you're a shit stylist. In a ridiculous fucking hat.
  • 21:08:26: Odd, you'd think that someone who is a top stylist would take care not to wear get up that emphasizes his extreme git qualities when on TV
  • 21:09:01: @Firequacker Pah, Leyton Orient did them 6-1. Only let them have one cause we felt sorry for them.
  • 21:30:46: Anybody got a good merseybeat and /or liverpool music playlist for #spotify?
  • 21:37:48: @SteveDoherty1 It's never made them go broke before.
  • 21:57:31: Had it confirmed that I am one of AHEd delegation proposed to education select committee. Must teach self not to swear.
  • 22:04:34: @MerseyMal Brill, ta, will ask again tomorrow when more tweeps awake. #merseybeat
  • 22:08:09: @bridd @pendlewitch bricking it already. Not even had confirmation from select committee that we'll be called.
  • 22:09:11: @BinaryDad Lots of planets have a copious supply of uppers...
  • 22:15:15: @Glinner DAMN YOU! I have writing, and reports and... ah well, having it on in the background can't hurt....
  • 22:28:11: tweet off, head down, honest
  • 23:52:20: Sentimental old fool.: My partner will tell you, it can take very little in the way of sentimental media to get .. http://bit.ly/Y69ip

Tweets copied by twittinesis.com

Sentimental old fool.

  • Sep. 22nd, 2009 at 10:20 PM
serious
My partner will tell you, it can take very little in the way of sentimental media to get me blubbing. Sometimes even a particularly well told joke, or perfect bit of plotting can bring a tear. Heck, I get misty at Inigo Montoya saying "I want my father back, you son of a bitch."

Which is as much to say, it wouldn't surprise those who know me when I nearly cried on a packed public train today over hearing a song on my mp3 player and thought "Oh, that would fit the funeral scene in Katz Curiosities perfectly."

The track was Yesterday by Paul Mcartney (yes I know it's a Beatles track, but none of the others are there). 100% mawkish sentiment. Smacked on top of a scene that only exists in my head and rough draft about a teenager losing her mum.

"Why she had to go, I don't know, she wouldn't say..." WAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!!

And the projected budget in my head for this could probably afford Mike McGurk on a kazoo on the film soundtrack... so THAT'S not going to happen.

But it's perfect. SO it's in my head. So it's there when I write Katy Katz next time.

Hope some of it comes out in the writing.

PS: Working title now The Sorcerer's Soul. Apologies to Ron Edwards, but that's the logical title, because that's the mcguffin...

WARNING: YES I KNOW ABOUT THE REPOSTS

  • Sep. 22nd, 2009 at 9:49 PM
serious
Just going through reposting the film / writing / acting stuff here, and some of the other stuff on Magpie's Nest.

So watch out for, over the next few days, an apparent flood of posts about old movies. But this is now going to be one of my shopfronts, so please bear with me.
serious
Part one: FFS Zack.

1. Someone should take Slow-Mo away from Zack Snyder until he learns how to use it responsibly. Really, you could knock off half an hour of runnign time if you just stopped treating every action sequence as violence porn (or just plain old porn for the sex scenes).

2. We know it's A Significant Story, stop telling us. So much signposting. Much of it with Slow-mo. It's treating Watchmen like Shakespeare, and you know what else sucks when you treat it like this? Shakespeare. Really, Moore's plotting, characterisation and dialogue are strong enough to stand without the support of LOOK AT THIS tics.

3. "Rorshach and Comedian are sociopaths. We just kill, err, anyone who gets in our face." I don't remember that from the comic. Weakens Rorshach and Comedian by making Laurie and Dan just as psychotic. Oh, and Chain Guns on Archie? WTF?

4. "Hi, I'm Adrian Veidt, simpering Euro-trash" I know, Robert Redford isn't 35 any more, and Brad was tied up with Benjamin Button. But really.

5. "Gratuitous gore is TEH KEWL!" Watchmen needs quite a bit of gore already to be authentic. Bits of gangster on the ceiling? Not so much.

6. Moving my favourite bit of dialogue to a different pair of characters. "It all worked out, didn't it? In the End?" "Nothing ever ends, Adrian." Ah, sue me, they're MY nitpicks.

7. Crouching Night-Owl, Hidden Rorshach. IMHO, I think only Ozymandias should get to do the borderline inhuman physical stuff. Rorshach doing matrix jumps? Eww.

8. ... Heartless? I don't know if anyone coming to this film would care about anyone enough. Seemed oddly sterile for most of the time. Like a polybagged first edition of a rare comic. You see what I did there?

Part Two: Stuff that wasn't Zack's fault.

1. The guys behind me in the cinema. I don't know if you're stoned, psychotic or just extremely badly socialized geeks, but the appropriate response to any example of graphic violence is NOT a high pitched giggle. Maybe they weren't paying atttention to all the cues, but when the Big Blue Guy explodes the Little Asian Guys, he's not being a hero according to any definition I know.

Part Three: Stuff that worked

1. The Big Plot Change. Yeah, makes sense, more plot-economical

2. The rest of the casting. As near to note perfect as makes no odds. Probably why the freakishly awful casting of Ozymandias stands out.

3. Design, effects, and the whole visual shebang. Primarily because they were committed to not fecking up the excellence of Gibbons and Higgins design.

4. You see that big list of 8 things? None of them are a film killer, though the slow-mo and the lack of human connection come close at times

Just A Geek (repost)

  • Sep. 22nd, 2009 at 9:40 PM
serious
(A response to this)

So, I went for a casting yesterday. Modelling job (I'm with the Ugly Model Agency).

Only instruction was "geeky".

Now, that covers a lot of ground. Corporate Geek? Comic book guy geek? Trekkie?

I went for corporate. The other guy I met there said he'd gone for "Open university math lecturer circa 1978", and hit it pretty squarely, I have to say.

Well, when I got there, the casting should have said "unattractive schlub", because that's what they are looking for.

(Incidentally, if folks want to hire me at reasonable rates to be an unattractive schlub, contact my agency. Seriously. I have no shame. Check my portfolio for proof.)

But the clients thought we'd be offended if they said unattractive schlub. They went to the UGLY model agency, and were worried they'd offend us. Folks, we signed that away when we joined.

But.

But, but, but.

Apparently, it's okay to say "geek" and know that everyone should understand "unattractive schlub".

Geek is my tribe. We contain multitudes. We tend to be an inclusive bunch.

And some of us are seriously TEH HAWT. Hell, my brother is a pretty high up tools developer for Sony and a Wil Wheaton lookalike. How much HAWTer do you WANT, people?

basic script:"...The geeky guy flirts with her, she puts the book back, then takes out the product placement and finds hot guy..."

Please, when it gets made, make the hot guy dress geeky.

And, oh yes, if they want me, do you think I'll take the job? £250 a day, possible two days shooting, and no obvious "THIS MAN IS UNATTRACTIVE BECAUSE HE IS A GEEK" signposting? Like. A. Shot.

In which I am a moron

  • Sep. 22nd, 2009 at 9:22 AM
serious
Okay, this blog is now officially for Script Bashing; personal and HE posts will go to Magpie's Nest... and while tidying the LJ last night, I deleted a shedload of posts by accident. I'll grab what I can from the Facebook feed and repost at MN, unless it's script related, in which case I'll repost here.

See, moron.
serious

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/schools/simon-webb-we-must-get-tough-on-home-schooling-1764348.html

From my facebook thread:

I believe Simon's children are miserable hothoused prisoners of their home who are desperate to escape their father, and will probably end up broken drug addicts selling their bodies for cash due to being unable to properly form relationships after their claustrophobic upbringing.

And I have as much evidence as Simon does of his worries. So I demand that I be allowed to inspect him.


Also, note that Simon "works with children with special needs in inner London ". So I'm guessing that he works for, or at the very least hand in glove with, the LA.

And from twitter:

thatdebswoman: OMG, I've only read the first paragraph & already seething - who the fuck is this prick?

pete_darby: Someone who wants Ed Balls to hold him, as the auto's scare him.

bridd: he wants Balls' sweaty caress

pete_darby: There is nothing good or right about that sentence.

Villification and Harassment...

  • Jul. 19th, 2009 at 9:26 PM
serious
Now, this really does take the biscuit.

The Department of Continued and Sustained FAIL are threatening to take their ball away... no, it's even sillier than that.

They're trying to take their facts away.

They're linking the existence of the satirical Badman Blog to the work of those brilliant people working away at official figures to demonstrate that Badman produced his figures in a monumental act of auto-proctological statistics.*

And so, they are reviewing the provision of FoI requests in light of the possibility that they may be used to "defame or vilify" the authors of the review.

Yes, they are witholding facts in case those facts are used to portray the author of a review (that claimed that monitoring was necessary, despite their being no evidence, on the grounds that some authority figures have "issues" for which their is no factual basis) in somewhat of a bad light.

I take it then that it is now policy that you can defame and villify a whole class of people on the basis of hearsay and deliberately manipulated figures, but that it is unacceptable to use facts to challenge that vilification.

Oh I forgot... in order to defame and vilify a whole class of people, you have to be working for the DCSF. Silly me.

*(And to those who doubt that, I say that any man who has spent a good portion of his life teaching science who then takes an unrepresentative sample, extracts the median value and then multiplies it unweighted across the whole class to obtain an aggregate figure, is not being merely disingenuous but actively misleading. Either he is too mendacious to be trusted with the review or incompetent. You see, unlike Mr Badman, I tend to vilify and defame people solely on the basis of clear evidence of their actions.)

Tour de RPG's...

  • Jul. 9th, 2009 at 9:46 AM
serious
Okay, this post arose from some frustrations of mine on an RPG list, that spilled over onto twitter, resulting in at least one old-school roleplayer looking at what I was describing with incomprehension and horror...

So this is kind of a beginners guide to what's out in the wilds beyond emulating heroic fantasy* in RPG land...

Breaking the Ice , a game that provoked much derision on twitter, a two hander, no prep RPG of the first three dates of a relationship, playable in one evening... ideal as a first date, in fact!

Universalis is about the only truly "universal" rpg I've seen. Also GM less, creates an economy of story control to drive narrative.

Steal Away Jordan, a game where the PC's are slaves in ante-bellum southern USA. 

Grey Ranks , where PC's are young (think child-adolescent-young adult) participants in the doomed Polish uprising of 1944

Nicotine Girls Where PC's are dead-end girls.

From the same writer: My Life with Master, PC's are minions of a Gothic villain, struggling for love.

Dogs in the Vineyard  where PC's are religious enforcers in a thinly fictionalised late 19th century west, called on to make moral judgements of the people. And occasionally shoot them. And each other.

And the list wouldn't be complete without Sorcerer , the grandaddy of STORY NOW games; it looks like a conventional RPG in the White Wolf Vampire / Mage mold... but it suckers you. It's all about dysfunctional relationships, and how much of an unspeakable sh*t your PC is prepared to become to get what they want... and what that makes them. Fantasy, yes. Heroic... only on it's own terms.

Next time: more conventional, but kick ass games.

*In this case fantasy being any kind of adventure fiction simulator, be it D&D, Traveller, RuneQuest, Shadowrun... regardless of presence of magic, Dwarves, Elves and Capital Letters

Old Broon's Book of Impractical fat cats...

  • Jun. 30th, 2009 at 12:25 PM
serious
From my wee baby brother, though it's starting to do the rounds......

He's outwardly respectable (they say he throws his phone),
His cabinet increasingly consists of him alone,
If public purse is is looted or the pension fund's been rifled,
Illegal wars are started and the nation's voice is stifled,
Economy is broken and the Commons past repair,
Ay, there's the wonder of the thing - Macavity's not there!

Macavity, Macavity, there's no-one like Macavity,
He's broken every human law, he breaks the law of gravity,
His powers of false accounting would make a conman stare
And by the time the bill comes in - Macavity's not there!

You may seek him in the Upper House, or some St Andrew's Chair,
But when the rot's discovered then Macavity's not there!
serious

AHEd as a whole, as an organisation, exists to support the right of everyone to home educate. That's it, straight down the line, anything else is a distraction, a side issue.
 
However. Forging ahead with the side issue...
 
What would disappoint me would be to say to anyone on the list "you can't express your opinions because it offends someone." This means that people are going to come up against other people expressing opinions they disagree with, but as long as it doesn't turn into people saying "people like you shouldn't home educate", I don't know that it's the business of AHEd in the person of the list owners to step in.
 
In order to keep AHEd as an organisation that supports all home educators, I think we need to accept disagreements, even very deeply held ones, and accept that in defending the right of all to home educate, we must defend people who are home educating in ways we may personally think are wrong. We have to accept any opposing sides in any argument, as long as they're all supporting the universal right to home ed, and as an organisation we should accept the presence of arguments as an okay thing to have, even a good thing.
 
One of the truisms of the fight for freedom of speech, freedom of conscience is that in order for it to be meaningful, you fight for the right for people to say and believe things you personally find repugnant. The fight for educational, parental, child freedom has to include freedom for people to handle their families in ways we find just plain wrong. It also includes the responsibility to tolerate people telling us we're doing it wrong ourselves!
 
As soon as we deny people the freedom to, in our opinion, Get It Wrong, we're heading for, at best, the Tasmanian model. But we have to balance this with excluding people by telling them You Cannot Say This Here.
 
As long as people in this group can say to each other "Even if I do not agree with how you live your life, I will defend your right to conduct it without the interference of the state or their dupes", in my opinion we're doing the right thing as a group.
 
Tolerance does not necessarily imply approval, disagreement does not necessarily imply intolerance. If we can foster a group that values both disagreement and tolerance in the service of defending the broad principle of home education FOR ALL, I think we'll be a stronger organisation for it.

The alternative is, I think, a homogeneous, exclusive, somewhat wishy washy group, dominated by passive aggressive sniping, veiled references to taboo subjects and off-list bitching. I've been involved in too many of those online, thank you very much, and AHEd is too important to let it become, well, like the rest of the internet.

Slightly too long to twitter... CopyDUMB.

  • May. 8th, 2009 at 9:35 AM
serious

MPAA tell teachers to record DVD's with a camcorder then burn their own discs instead of ripping

Now, not only is this monumentally stupid, and a waste of time... haven't they repeatedly said that ANY copying or format shifting is breaking the DMCA?

SO not only are they telling teachers to break the law, but do it in the most half-arsed, neandethal fashion. Well done, lads.

Parent's Declaration

  • May. 7th, 2009 at 8:40 AM
serious

PARENTS’ DECLARATION

WE DECLARE our independent status and affirm our responsibility for the upbringing and education of our children in accordance with our lawful rights and natural justice.

WE ASSERT our right to choose the place, form and content of the educational provision for our children in accordance with the following:

The parent of every child of compulsory school age shall cause him to receive efficient full-time education suitable—

(a)to his age, ability and aptitude, and

(b)to any special educational needs he may have,

either by regular attendance at school or otherwise.

(Section 7 of theEducation Act 1996)

 

In the exercise of any functions which it assumes in relation to education and to teaching, the State shall respect the right of parents to ensure such education and teaching in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.

(Protocol 2 Article 1 of the European Convention of Human Rights)

 

WE WILL protect the rights of our children to own their own lives, to privacy and freedom from undue official interference in accordance with the following rights:

 

The right to respect for a private and family life, home and correspondence

(Human Rights Act 1998)

 

the right to be free from “arbitrary or unlawful interference with [their] privacy, family, home or correspondence” and from “unlawful attacks on [their] honour and reputation

(Article 16 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child)

 

WE DEMAND that state officials remain within the bounds of the powers already conferred upon them under current law in their dealings with us, the people. 

 

WE WILL UPHOLD AND DEFEND the above principles without fear or favour where the state forgets its legitimate function, oversteps its bounds or seeks to exert undue influence or power over our lives and those of our children against our traditional freedoms and natural justice.

May 1st 2009

 

Please indicate support for this Declaration via the comments box on http://ahed.pbworks.com/ParentsDeclaration or write to ahed 

serious
Part one: FFS Zack.

1. Someone should take Slow-Mo away from Zack Snyder until he learns how to use it responsibly. Really, you could knock off half an hour of runnign time if you just stopped treating every action sequence as violence porn (or just plain old porn for the sex scenes).

2. We know it's A Significant Story, stop telling us. So much signposting. Much of it with Slow-mo. It's treating Watchmen like Shakespeare, and you know what else sucks when you treat it like this? Shakespeare. Really, Moore's plotting, characterisation and dialogue are strong enough to stand without the support of LOOK AT THIS tics.

3. "Rorshach and Comedian are sociopaths. We just kill, err, anyone who gets in our face." I don't remember that from the comic. Weakens Rorshach and Comedian by making Laurie and Dan just as psychotic. Oh, and Chain Guns on Archie? WTF?

4. "Hi, I'm Adrian Veidt, simpering Euro-trash" I know, Robert Redford isn't 35 any more, and Brad was tied up with Benjamin Button. But really.

5. "Gratuitous gore is TEH KEWL!" Watchmen needs quite a bit of gore already to be authentic. Bits of gangster on the ceiling? Not so much.

6. Moving my favourite bit of dialogue to a different pair of characters. "It all worked out, didn't it? In the End?" "Nothing ever ends, Adrian." Ah, sue me, they're MY nitpicks.

7. Crouching Night-Owl, Hidden Rorshach. IMHO, I think only Ozymandias should get to do the borderline inhuman physical stuff. Rorshach doing matrix jumps? Eww.

8. ... Heartless? I don't know if anyone coming to this film would care about anyone enough. Seemed oddly sterile for most of the time. Like a polybagged first edition of a rare comic. You see what I did there?

Part Two: Stuff that wasn't Zack's fault.

1. The guys behind me in the cinema. I don't know if you're stoned, psychotic or just extremely badly socialized geeks, but the appropriate response to any example of graphic violence is NOT a high pitched giggle. Maybe they weren't paying atttention to all the cues, but when the Big Blue Guy explodes the Little Asian Guys, he's not being a hero according to any definition I know.

Part Three: Stuff that worked

1. The Big Plot Change. Yeah, makes sense, more plot-economical

2. The rest of the casting. As near to note perfect as makes no odds. Probably why the freakishly awful casting of Ozymandias stands out.

3. Design, effects, and the whole visual shebang. Primarily because they were committed to not fecking up the excellence of Gibbons and Higgins design.

4. You see that big list of 8 things? None of them are a film killer, though the slow-mo and the lack of human connection come close at times.

Tweets for Today

  • Mar. 11th, 2009 at 12:06 AM
serious
24 hours of Twits:

  • 07:22 ON Sunday, I got to play boardgames all day with my son and other excellent people. WIN. #
  • 11:05 Things I didn't know, part 1,235,346,234,221: every offence is arrestible, since 2005 is.gd/mGd7 #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter